Template:Did you know nominations/Local Public Planning Council

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Local Public Planning Council

edit
  • Reviewed: Super Robot Wars UX
  • Comment: 1. An ALT blurb could entail the reasons this was formed (as cited on the page), 2. The articel already meets the min. requirement for DYK, but im expanding it a bit more in a day or 2.

Created by Lihaas (talk). Self nom at 14:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

  • This article is new enough and long enough. The hook fact, though no doubt true, does not have an inline citation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The source doesnt say local government exactly, but its an institution of local government. "subdivision of municipal government" is sourced within ref 1. Lihaas (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The DYK requirement is that the "hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article". I take that to mean a citation in, or at the end of, the actual sentence backing up the hook fact. In this case, the first sentence in the first paragraph is the relevant one but there is not a citation until the end of the paragraph. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Done, but i dont see why we have to blindly follow rules against common sense ;)Lihaas (talk) 03:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Inline citation added. Now ready to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)