Template:Did you know nominations/Long gu

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset talk 00:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Previously marked for closure, no action from nominator despite multiple recent pings; closing as unsuccessful.

Long gu

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in traditional Chinese medicine, fossils are traditionally believed to be the remains of dragons? Source: "They were historically believed, and are traditionally considered, to be the remains of dragons."
  • Reviewed:

Created by Mychemicalromanceisrealemo (talk). Self-nominated at 13:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Long gu; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - maybe, citation template suggests issues.
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited: - Not really despite a mention in the article.
• Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: I would like to give the benefit of the doubt that the sources do say something related to your fact at least, but I need to be able know whether one of the source specifically states the fact relating to that in the DYK nomination. You'll need to state one source in the nomination that supports it. Also, whatever problem there is that someone placed an issue regarding an unclear citation style, you may need to address that as well. PrimalMustelid (talk) 00:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• @Mychemicalromanceisrealemo: in case you didn't see my review. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

@Mychemicalromanceisrealemo: Please respond to the above. Z1720 (talk) 01:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Got it. Tryin to make a change :-/ 09:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

@Mychemicalromanceisrealemo: It's been a month, any progress for your DYK nomination? PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Nominator Mychemicalromanceisrealemo has not responded to numerous pings, so I am closing this as abandoned. Z1720 (talk) 01:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I left them a talk page message. If there is still no response soon this can be closed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

I thought this was closed a while ago? Tryin to make a change :-/ 19:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mychemicalromanceisrealemo: It was marked for closure a while ago, but as long as the nomination has not been rejected/archived, discussion and work can still continue. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

I plan to close this nomination in the next 24 to 48 hours unless there is a firm commitment from Tryin to make a change :-/ to take care of the issues before I've closed it, and to have everything settled within a week's time. If someone decides to close it sooner, I won't object. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)