Template:Did you know nominations/Maroon Creek Bridge

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Maroon Creek Bridge

edit

Bridge from west portal

Created/expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 18:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review for original hook
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)
Hook review for ALT1
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)
Hook review for ALT2
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Fine Crisco 1492 (talk)


  • What is essentially two uncited paragraphs in the 1946–2003: Resort growth and stresses section are holding this nomination back. Prefer ALT1; the original is unclear and the alt is less than hooky. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 Done I've added sources for those grafs. I suppose if we added the fact that the Midland had more or less gotten to the creek before the Rio Grande had even started building to the first hook, it would work, but I don't know how we make that fit the character limit. Daniel Case (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • ALT1 and AL2 only. I can't think of a way to word the original in a both interesting and succinct manner. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)