Template:Did you know nominations/McKee Run

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by ~ RobTalk 10:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Cropped image used to appear better at small sizes.

McKee Run

edit
McKee Run
McKee Run
  • ... that all streams in the watershed of McKee Run (pictured) are impaired by siltation and removal of vegetation?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 15:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC).

  • I moved the nomination to July 10, the date of namespace move... and creation. George Ho (talk) 05:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Age and size ok, article neutral, QPQ done.....can we find a better hook? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

I think something "mockumentary-like" like

ALT1 ... that parts of McKee Run (pictured) could benefit from additional riparian buffering?

@Casliber: ALT1 is all right as well. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 11:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
O-kay, I guess that another review is needed now (sigh) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • This should be GTG. Article was new enough when nominated, is long enough, and neutrally written. No copy-vios that I can find (I site with common text, which seems to be getting it from here). Both hooks are cited inline and supported by the sources. QPQ done. Image is free use. My personal preference is for the original hook, but that's just me. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)