- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mimi Mondal
edit- ... that Mimi Mondal is the first writer from India to be nominated for a Hugo Award? Source: "The speculative fiction writer and the first Hugo Award nominee from India, Monidipa “Mimi” Mondal" "Hugo Nomination for Indian Writer" Deccan Chronicle (22 April 2018))
- ALT1:
... that Mimi Mondal co-edited Luminescent Threads, nominated for the 2018 Hugo award as "best related work"?Source: "Her first book, Luminescent Threads: Connections to Octavia Butler, edited along with Alexandra Pierce, is currently a finalist for the Hugo Awards 2018, and longlisted for the Locus Awards 2018. They were nominated under the ‘Best Related Work’ category" "Hugo Nomination for Indian Writer" Deccan Chronicle (22 April 2018))
- ALT1:
- Reviewed:
QPQ To ComeAlfred Eteson - Comment: Both hooks are supported by several other sources already cited in the article
- Reviewed:
Created by Draken122 (talk), DESiegel (talk), TheOneWorkingAccount (talk), and Ymblanter (talk). Nominated by DESiegel (talk) at 09:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC).
Hello, I came by to promote this, but I have some questions about the article. First: is her date of birth or at least year of birth unknown? Secondly, the "Bibliography" section completely lacks references. Perhaps each work could be individually cited, or a general citation listing all her works could be added here? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hello, Narutolovehinata5. She does not list a year of birth in the biography section of her own web site, nor in her online resume. None of the cited sources list one, nor did any source I found, and I looked for one. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Bibliographies are generally self-citing,and do not need footnotes, as a published work is a valid source about itself, if proper bibliographic info has been listed. However I see the info about several of the works is incomplete. I will attempt to fill it out and/or provide additional souring, and ping you when I have done so. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DESiegel: It has been almost a month since your last updates to the article, have there been any updates since then? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- The nominator has not edited since June 30. Calling on article co-contributor Ymblanter to comment if they wish to continue the nomination. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 and Yoninah: In response to the concerns above, I've gone through and added citations for the bibliography entries as requested and converted the in-text urls in the bibliography to inline citations. I also checked for the author's birthdate;
the only comment I could find was one that indicated she was born "in the 1970s".Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 20:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mary Mark Ockerbloom:
If you can find that source, maybe we can add it? Like we could add a year of birth range in the article (something like "born c. 1970s" or wording to that effect).Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC) - I double checked and found I was in error -- the dating actually applied to another author discussed in the same article. So no, I haven't found any usable dates. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 08:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mary Mark Ockerbloom:
- @Narutolovehinata5 and Yoninah: In response to the concerns above, I've gone through and added citations for the bibliography entries as requested and converted the in-text urls in the bibliography to inline citations. I also checked for the author's birthdate;
- I have seen that Mary Mark Ockerbloom has done everything better than I could have ever done it, and I do not think my intervention could improve anything at this stage.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Ready for a review. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
