Template:Did you know nominations/Muhlenbergia pungens

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 13:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Closing at request of article author

Muhlenbergia pungens

edit

Muhlenbergia pungens

Created/expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 20:42, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Length-wise this is too borderline for me to feel comfortable running through as-is. Its 1545 characters long but has a lot of references, which means the actual substantial text is probably a bit short of the 1500 characters. Of course, it only needs a sentence or two more, so the nominator shouldn't have any trouble getting it up to par. Abyssal (talk) 17:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I just spotted this. For some reason the nom is a bit unexpected. Anyway, I have added some content that pushed it up to 1841 characters (324 words) "readable prose size". Aymatth2 (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Article is new enough and also long enough. Hook fact accepted in good faith. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pulled from main page owing to current copyvio tag. I disagree with it, but one needs to be safe. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I am blind to the copyvio concern, but also wonder if it makes sense to relist. It is amusing that a tussock of sandy and inedible grass got onto the main page, even if only briefly. It is the nominator's choice, but I would drop it now. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Well considering that the current version is now only about a third of the size required for DYK and the creator has said that he wants to drop it, so I think it would make sense to delist this now. Miyagawa (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)