- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Mumbai Mirror
5x expanded by Tayi Arajakate (talk). Self-nominated at 05:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall: to sell 200'000 in its inaugural issue is remarkable feat, (1 lakh are 100'000, had to look it up, too) it is neutral and no copy bio issues as per Earwig. ALT1 and ALT2 (AGF on the sourcing) might also be good. I prefer ALT0 as I see this as a remarkable feat, ALT1 is a bit on sex sells, but of course we are also encouraged to see how many page views we get here. ALT2 is maybe a bit too specific, at least for me it is. Bottom line, the DYK is good to go, and I leave it the prepper which question we use. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)