Template:Did you know nominations/Myogenesis

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Myogenesis's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC).
Referencing

Myogenesis

edit

5x expanded by TheRealTPng (talk), DrLinguini (talk). Nominated by Smallman12q (talk) at 22:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Prowse<2k on 3 April, >11k now, 5 times increase.
  • There is a citation needed template on the article. Martin451 (talk) 08:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Someone else needs to review this, as I don't understand the content.Martin451 (talk) 09:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
  • It needs to have its section titles decapitalized, and a lot more inline citations before this can be seriously considered.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 13:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)