Template:Did you know nominations/National Police Memorial (India)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Flibirigit (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
National Police Memorial (India)
edit- ... that the National Police Memorial in India has a 'Wall of Valour' which bears the names of 34,844 police personnel who have died in the line of duty since India's Independence in 1947? Source: "Built in recognition of 38,844 police personnel who have died in the line of duty since Independence. Names of all the 38,844 personnel are engraved on Wall of Valour"
- ALT1:... that the National Police Memorial in India bears the names of of 34,844 police personnel who have died in the line of duty since India's Independence in 1947, including 424 personnel who died this year? Source: "The Wall of Valour has the names of all 34,844 martyrs engraved on granite. Since 1947, 34,844 police personnel have been martyred, with 424 losing their lives this year."
- ALT2:... that the new National Police Memorial museum showcases over 2000 years of policing in the region, all the way back from the time of Kautilya's system of law and order in 310 BCE. Source: "you will be able to see examples of over 2,000 years of policing from the ancient till the recent times. These include the Kautilya system of law and order in 310BC.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ahmadou Ahidjo (Please note, this is my first DYK review. I have also made less than 5 DYKs, so QPQ does not apply, but I still tried a QPQ nevertheless.)
Created/expanded by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 20:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC).
- Comment — As flattering as it is to be credited for creating/expanding substantially this article, I wouldn't feel right in taking credit for this, all I did was a bit of copyediting, in addition to adding a bunch of convert templates, I don't think one should receive DYK credit for contributions that significant. Hence, I have removed my name from the nomination text, but, I would like to thank DiplomatTesterMan for adding my name to this, very nice of him to do so! I won't review this DYK nomination, though, because of having contributed to the article before its DYK nomination. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 20:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and the article is neutral. There was a little close paraphrasing which I removed. As for the hooks, I have tweaked them so as not to say it lists them "all" as the number will never be up to date. Any of the hooks could be used. No QPQ needed here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
