Template:Did you know nominations/North Carolina Sullivan Acts

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

North Carolina Sullivan Acts

(

)

The city of Asheville

... that in the Asheville Water Debate, spawned by the North Carolina Sullivan Acts only one of five representatives in the committee represents Asheville (pictured)?

ALT1:... that as a result of the North Carolina Sullivan Acts, Asheville, North Carolina (pictured), is the only city in the state that cannot use the water rate as benefit of annexation?
ALT2:... that Asheville (pictured) is the only city restricted by the North Carolina Sullivan Acts?
Comment: Article finished in my sandbox on April 5, moved to mainspace April 12.

Created/expanded by Sgr2124 (talk). Self nom at 16:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

, Length, citations, neutral, time all check out, the hook needs a little work, the suggestions show bias or a too vague. Here is an alternative hook. Once the hook is agreed upon, this can be passed. Suggested hook is 199 characters Kayz911 (talk) 02:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

ALT3:... that as a result of the North Carolina Sullivan Acts, Asheville, North Carolina (pictured), is the only city within the state that cannot charge a higher water rate for consumers outside city limits?

I think the new alt hook works fine. Thank you. Sgr2124 (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Very good thank you for your quick response. In that case we will pass this article for the dyk status with ALT3. Good job Kayz911 (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)