Template:Did you know nominations/Ophionereis reticulata

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Ophionereis reticulata's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

Ophionereis reticulata

edit

Ophionereis reticulata

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 12:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Article is new enough, long enough, and within policy (with plenty of well-formatted citations). The hook is short enough and interesting; its facts are also cited in the article. In this case, I believe that piping from the common, English name is better than using the latin Ophionereis reticulata in the hook, although others sometimes differ on this point (B3). I say, good to go! - ʈucoxn\talk 03:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)