Template:Did you know nominations/Otia Imperialia

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 10:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Otia Imperialia

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that philosopher Gottfried Leibniz referred to Gervase of Tilbury's encyclopedia Otia Imperialia (1214) as a "bagful of foolish old woman's tales"?

Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk). Self nom at 15:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Reviewed List of Kings XI Punjab cricketers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

: Length, date, hook checked out; good to go, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

• QPQ required; article should not be approved until it is supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

• I sent him a message yesterday at 18:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC) about this problem, but he haven't responded yet. Mentoz86 (talk) 23:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

There ya go.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

• QPQ not satisfied: it is not a listed nomination. Please review one that's actually submitted on the nominations page. ("Seems nice" isn't an adequate review, either.) BlueMoonset (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

I officially resign from nominating DYKs myself, thanks. Its undoubtedly ridiculous that an article which could clearly appear on the main page on the evening of creation takes a whole month and even then for their still to be hostility and pettiness towards it. The time it takes to reach the front page has become absurdly long and I've essentially forgotten I created the articles by the time they hit the front page. The organization of DYKs in my opinion has diminished with QPQ and we'd be better off showcasing the best articles for longer within a 3 day period of creation.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

• QPQ nomination was subsequently listed, so requirement is now satisfied. Restoring original tick per review by Maculosae tegmine lyncis. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)