- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
PZL SM-4 Łątka
edit- ... that the PZL SM-4 Łątka never flew as its engine was not approved for use in flight?
Created/expanded by Nigel Ish (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 22:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Length and newness fine. I'll AGF on the Polish language pdf. The global security ref checks out, but it's not a great source in my own area of interest (but it may be fine on Polish helicopters). As I'm presuming that the Polish ref also agrees it's fine. Some English work needed on the first sentence under design and development. Apart from that I think it's good to go. Secretlondon (talk) 23:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Did some copyediting on the awkward phrasing, how is it now? - The Bushranger One ping only 01:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Done some more. I think we need a reference for that paragraph though.Secretlondon (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Gah, I knew I was forgetting something. Done. - The Bushranger One ping only 15:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Done some more. I think we need a reference for that paragraph though.Secretlondon (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Did some copyediting on the awkward phrasing, how is it now? - The Bushranger One ping only 01:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Secretlondon (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
