Template:Did you know nominations/Panulirus penicillatus
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Keilana|Parlez ici 03:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Panulirus penicillatus
edit- ... that although the spiny lobster Panulirus penicillatus is heavily exploited for food throughout its range, its total population seems relatively unaffected?
- Reviewed: Paramahamsa Upanishad
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC).
- Article is brand new, long enough, neutral, uses inline citations to sources, and appears to be free of copyvio problems. The hook is OK. QPQ review checks out. No image offered for DYK; there are a couple of Commons images in the article, but I doubt they would look very good if reduced.
Good to go. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Could we maybe have a more interesting hook? Something about them being 'coral cray' maybe? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- There is nothing particularly interesting that leaps out of the article in my opinion. I find the hook interesting because, unlike some fish that are heavily exploited for food and whose numbers dwindle, this lobster lays so many eggs that it maintains its numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Looks absolutely fine to me. And yes, it is unusual in its field. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- There is nothing particularly interesting that leaps out of the article in my opinion. I find the hook interesting because, unlike some fish that are heavily exploited for food and whose numbers dwindle, this lobster lays so many eggs that it maintains its numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Article is brand new, long enough, neutral, uses inline citations to sources, and appears to be free of copyvio problems. The hook is OK. QPQ review checks out. No image offered for DYK; there are a couple of Commons images in the article, but I doubt they would look very good if reduced.
