Template:Did you know nominations/Panza Kick Boxing

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Panza Kick Boxing

(

)

... that fighting video game Panza Kick Boxing was endorsed by a French kickboxing champion who also supplied technical advice? Source: Patterson, Mark (January 1991). "Andre Panza's Kick Boxing". CU Amiga: 49.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/108 Leonard
- Comment:

5x expanded by Coin945 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC).

Seems to have been 5x expanded at time of nomination, the article reads fine though could use some light copyediting. This might seem daft, but the hook fact is not explicitly stated in the article (merely that Panza "endorsed" and "advised", not that it was "named after" him), nor is it actually found in the source (probably because it's obvious). Much of the "meat" of the article is derived from the reception/legacy, though this is probably to be expected of a video game piece. Also awaiting QPQ. Kingoflettuce (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Coin945: It's been 10 days since the review, have you accomplished a QPQ yet? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
  - As you can see above, I've reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/108 Leonard. Hope this helps!-Coin945 (talk) 02:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
    - Thanks. @Coin945: Have Kingoflettuce's other concerns been addressed yet? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
      - Yes, I believe the other things in @Kingoflettuce:'s review were suggestions rather than directives. The article is good to go.--Coin945 (talk) 09:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
        @Coin945: The "named after" versus "endorsed by" discrepancy is still an issue. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
        As Kingoflettuce wrote above, I figured it didn't need to be sourced due to obviousness, but I've rephrased to 'endorsed by'.--Coin945 (talk) 02:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
New reviewer needed; original reviewer hasn't returned since their first comment a month ago despite pings. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

CSJJ104 (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)