Template:Did you know nominations/Piano Quintet (Schnittke)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 06:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Piano Quintet (Schnittke)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

[[File:|140px|Alfred Schnittke in 1994 ]]

Alfred Schnittke in 1994

• ... that the Piano Quintet by Alfred Schnittke (pictured) has been called "one of the most depressing pieces ever written"? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/112826009/the-times-mail/
  • ALT1: ... that composing the Piano Quintet eventually led to Alfred Schnittke's (pictured) conversion to Catholicism? Source: Valentina Kholopova: Kompozitor Alfred Schnittke: Monografiya (pp. 136–137, 183)
  • ALT2: ... that Alfred Schnittke (pictured) said he had "help" in completing his Piano Quintet? Source: Valentina Kholopova: Kompozitor Alfred Schnittke: Monografiya (p. 185) "Периодом богоискательства стали семидесятые годы, когда композитор пришел к концепции веры в музыке, — мы говорили о метафоре «помощи оттуда», воплощенной автором при написании финала Квинтета памяти матери."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Vietnamese language in the United States
  • Comment: QPQ coming soon. Done!

Created by CurryTime7-24 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC).

• Article looks good and good blurb. QpQ needs to be done. SyntheticSystems (talk) 20:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  • @SyntheticSystems: Finished the QPQ. Let me know if everything checks out now! —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
    • Yeah, looks good. SyntheticSystems (talk) 01:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
• @CurryTime7-24: Double review as that is the first review by the above editor and I wanted to check it myself. I agree that QPQ is the only missing element: the article is new enough and long enough, the hook facts check out (AGF on Russian-language sourcing), the photo is PD, and there are no textual issues. When QPQ is supplied, ping SyntheticSystems for a tick. (@SyntheticSystems: This needs an AGF tick, not the green tick.) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Verified the first hook. AGF on the other ones. BorgQueen (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)