Template:Did you know nominations/Polyacetylene

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 16:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Polyacetylene

edit

5x expanded by 540f13gsi (talk). Nominated by ChemLibrarian (talk) at 15:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Comment: suggested blurb is wordy. By avoiding the extra words, there is enough room to give the scientists' full names (see alt1). --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Article is big enough 12472 up from 1804 readable characters, and so its expanded enough. SDSChem however only changed a word and so should not receive credit, 540f13gsi did all the heavy work. So I have removed the user. The article is full of references and is neutral. I can't find copyright problems. QPQ not preformed but not required. Hook is in article, referenced and confirmed. The alt1 hook is 183 chars, so short enough. Good to go with ALT1. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)