Template:Did you know nominations/Pompton Junction station
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Pompton Junction station
- ... that a
wildshootout broke out at Pompton Junction station in New Jersey over $600 worth of stolen metal and clothing? Citation 11: the NYDH article- ALT1:... that an officer was nearly killed in a
wildshootout at Pompton Junction station with metal and clothing thieves? Citation 11: the NYDH article
- ALT1:... that an officer was nearly killed in a
- Comment: New article, first DYK attempt of 2020 for me.Mitch32(Fame is a four letter word.) 20:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Created by Mitchazenia (talk). Self-nominated at 17:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC).
- Hi Mitchazenia, here are my comments. epicgenius (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - yes
Cited in the same paragraph. However, it needs to be repeated at the end of the sentence as well. WP:DYK#Cited hook says the cite mustappearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact. Citations at the end of the paragraph are not sufficient.
- Interesting:
QPQ: - yes
(You have 6 DYK nominations already, so a QPQ is needed)
Overall: epicgenius (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
6? I have 52 DYKs. Mitch32(Fame is a four letter word.) 04:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mitchazenia: The DYK tool only counts 6, though older DYK nominations are not counted. In any case, because you have more than 5 DYKs, a QPQ needs to be done before this can be approved. epicgenius (talk) 15:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Already did it. Still think this is stupid. Mitch32(Fame is a four letter word.) 17:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- I assume that your QPQ is Template:Did you know nominations/Passage of Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Since you have done that, and added the citation, looks like this is good to go. epicgenius (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Mitchazenia, the quid pro quo review needs to be a complete review of both article and hook(s): newness, size, neutral, adequately sourced, and free from close paraphrasing/copyvio. For example, the "contrary to public opinion" hook claim is unsourced, so the hook cannot pass unless it is. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Done, but goes without saying I won't be nominating a DYK for a while. QPQ is a bit silly. Mitch32(Fame is a four letter word.) 06:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Restoring tick by epicgenius; while the QPQ review wasn't quite complete, it was fairly close, and the nomination has since been approved by another reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- I assume that your QPQ is Template:Did you know nominations/Passage of Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Since you have done that, and added the citation, looks like this is good to go. epicgenius (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Already did it. Still think this is stupid. Mitch32(Fame is a four letter word.) 17:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)