- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Project 119
edit- ... that Carl Sagan tried to nuke the Moon?
- Reviewed: Eris (simulation)
Created/expanded by Grapple X (talk). Self nom at 04:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) |
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) | Miyagawa (talk) |
- Might I suggest an alt hook here, because the hook as it reads seems to be a little misleading as it was not his effort/proposal/idea (it was the Air Force's), merely that he was part of the team in charge of studying its feasibility. To wit:
- ALT1: ... that Carl Sagan studied the idea of nuking the Moon? Moogwrench (talk) 08:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- I know what you mean, but I think you lose a lot of "punch" when you try to clarify things. Sagan was, to an extent, responsible as a project member, and the article does make it clear what his involvement was. If the blunter version is too misleading then yeah, go with the hook, but I think it's sufficiently accurate to draw a reader into the article to find out the full extent of his work with the project.