Template:Did you know nominations/Quatre Motets sur des thèmes grégoriens
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Quatre Motets sur des thèmes grégoriens
edit
Maurice Duruflé in 1962
- ... that in his 1960 Quatre Motets sur des thèmes grégoriens, Maurice Duruflé (pictured) "shows his particular genius for invoking the spiritual element of plainsong in a polyphonic context"? Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
to come - Comment: The quote is the wording of one musicologist but others write similarly, and it explains the French title. I like that the image of the composer who composed not many pieces - each one a jewel - is close to composition time.
- Reviewed:
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC).
QPQ done, created in time, new article, hook is interesting, source checks out, no copyvio issues, within policy. Good to go! Futurist110 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Bastiampillai Anthonipillai Thomas. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Futurist110, I'm confused as to how you could have passed this nomination over two days before the QPQ review was provided. Perhaps you should recheck all aspects of your review, since this one was not adequately checked? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oops--clumsy me! Basically, I looked at this DYK? nomination rather quickly and thus thought that I saw a QPQ done for this article whereas in reality there was none. Anyway, please give me several days to do a new review of this DYK? nomination. Futurist110 (talk) 03:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- I am donating one of my excess QPQ and replacing the tick to get this nomination moving. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oops--clumsy me! Basically, I looked at this DYK? nomination rather quickly and thus thought that I saw a QPQ done for this article whereas in reality there was none. Anyway, please give me several days to do a new review of this DYK? nomination. Futurist110 (talk) 03:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)