- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sohom Datta talk 10:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
R/nosleep
- ... that police were called several times in 2014 about a fictitious post on r/nosleep?
Moved to mainspace by Di (they-them) (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.
Di (they-them) (talk) 00:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC).
- Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- (comment) Article is long enough and moved to mainspace recently enough. Earwig says "violation unlikely". Interesting hook that is well-cited and mentioned in the article body, although maybe mentioning that the post was fictitious could highlight the unusual aspect better? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Chaotic Enby: Since you already did the review whereas I haven't started yet, I'm fine if you 'take' the review. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, in this case it's approved!
Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, in this case it's approved!
- @Chaotic Enby: Since you already did the review whereas I haven't started yet, I'm fine if you 'take' the review. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know if I'm allowed to edit the hook post-approval, but I just added the word "fictitious" per Chaotic Enby's suggestion. I hope that's OK. Di (they-them) (talk) 03:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)