Template:Did you know nominations/Randall Cunningham II
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 10:36, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Randall Cunningham II
edit... that the son of 4-time Pro Bowl quarterback Randall Cunningham, Randall Cunningham II, has set Amateur Athletic Union and USA Track & Field national high jump records?
- Reviewed: 7th of 7 QPQs against Template:Did you know nominations/Going to the Dogs
- Comment:
currently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Cunningham II
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nominated at 03:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC).
- (ALT1)
... that Pro Bowl quarterback Randall Cunningham's best high school high jump was 6 feet 9 inches (2.06 m), but his son, Randall Cunningham II, jumped 7 feet 3.25 inches (2.22 m) in his junior year?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC) - (ALT2) ... that 4-time Pro Bowl quarterback Randall Cunningham's best high school high jump was 6 feet 9 inches (2.06 m), but Randall Cunningham II jumped 7 feet 3.25 inches (2.22 m) in his junior year?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- (ALT1)
Article is new enough and long enough. AfD has been withdrawn by the nominator. But the main hook fact seems misleading. The hook says he holds US "national high jump records". In reality, he merely set the record for 15-16 year olds. This needs to be clarified. Cbl62 (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I like Alt2. I think I agree with Cbl62 that, if you don't follow high school track, the first hook seems misleading. I think ALT2 would be a nice sports DYK. --(AfadsBad (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC))
- Please review ALT2 then.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- I like Alt2. I think I agree with Cbl62 that, if you don't follow high school track, the first hook seems misleading. I think ALT2 would be a nice sports DYK. --(AfadsBad (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC))
- Note: have struck AfD notice and original hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- ALT2 review: Format correct, getting a bit long at 191 but difficult to chop anything without losing accuracy, both facts present in article and correctly cited. Article: copyvio clean, length fine, under 2 days old at nom time, citation requirements met, NPOV fine, no BLP concerns. I have struck ALT1 per nominator's request to review ALT2. Six weeks on, good to go!
Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 21:17, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- ALT2 review: Format correct, getting a bit long at 191 but difficult to chop anything without losing accuracy, both facts present in article and correctly cited. Article: copyvio clean, length fine, under 2 days old at nom time, citation requirements met, NPOV fine, no BLP concerns. I have struck ALT1 per nominator's request to review ALT2. Six weeks on, good to go!
