Template:Did you know nominations/Reed v. Town of Gilbert
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Reed v. Town of Gilbert
edit- ... that a United States Supreme Court Justice said a recent decision may be a "recipe for judicial management of ordinary government regulatory activity"?
- ALT1 ... that in a recent United States Supreme Court decision, one Justice suggested the Court may soon become "a veritable Supreme Board of Sign Review"?
- Reviewed: Silvana Imam
5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 16:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC).
This article is long enough. I doubt it should have been nominated for 7 November, because the nominator has been working on it since 29 October. Nevertheless, it has been expanded five-fold in the seven days to 7 November so should qualify on a date-of-nomination basis. Either hook could be used as both have citations to reliable sources. The article is neutral and I found no evidence of copyright issues in the spot checks I made. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
