Template:Did you know nominations/Silvana Imam

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Silvana Imam

edit
Silvana Imam
Silvana Imam
  • ... that Silvana Imam (pictured) and her girlfriend Beatrice Eli performed together in 2015 under the stage name Vierge Moderne?

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self-nominated at 12:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC).

  • This article is under the required 1500 character minimum. If you expand it, then I can review it for you, but please remember that the DYK Rules require articles to be at least 1500 characters long. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Notecardforfree:Thank you. I have expanded the article. Let me know what you think.BabbaQ (talk) 20:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
  • This article was created on October 17, it is within policy, and the picture here is licensed by CC. The hook is less than 200 characters and supported by inline citations. The sources are in Swedish, but a quick check with google translate verifies their accuracy. QPQ is satisfied. The problem is that this article is still too short (1441 characters). You are very close, but you still need to add a little more material here. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Now that the article has been expanded above the 1500 character threshold, this is good to go. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Regrettably, the QPQ was both incomplete and failed to note that the hook was well over the maximum length allowed. If the QPQ is properly completed, then this nomination can be reapproved, but not until then. (Also: I removed the extra ellipsis from the hook here.) BlueMoonset (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  • BabbaQ, unfortunately, the QPQ for Catanzaro is almost identical to the QPQ that you initially provided for this article. It looks like you didn't check for close paraphrasing/plagiarism in the Catanzaro review. Also (and this is a moot point now that Catanzaro has already appeared on the main page) the hook was not supported by the source in that article. The source cited examples of crimes that had occurred in the province, but the source did not state that the crimes were committed by organized syndicates. Therefore, another review is needed here before this nomination can be approved. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC
  • BabbaQ, the Leandro Rodríguez review is another review where you did not consider policy criteria. To that extent, it is also functionally equivalent to the review that was rejected by BlueMoonset above. I don't want to undermine BlueMoonset's judgment in this matter, so it may be best to start a new review, rather than link to an old one. I really appreciate the work you have done to review articles, but I want to be fair to the judgments of other editors as well. Thanks so much for your understanding with this. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
  • The new QPQ satisfies all relevant criteria. Now that this issue has been settled, this is good to go. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)