- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Reflective writing
- ... that reflective writing is a good way to increase empathy in medical students? Source: DasGupta 2004
5x expanded by Pfowler17 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article does not appear to have increased five times in size in the past ten days. On 13 February, the article was 1543 bytes of readable prose size, and it was 4682 bytes on 27 February. Or am I missing something? Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 07:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Farang Rak Tham: Nope, you're not missing anything: I guess I didn't realize it was too short. Thanks for looking/sorry for the trouble! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfowler17 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
No problem, Pfowler17. Keep up the good work, and let me know when you have a 5x increase.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 05:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Farang Rak Tham, this appears to have been a greater than 5x expansion over 14 days by a first-time DYK submitter who was part of an academic class, yet stuck around past the end of their class (which ended February 26) to participate here. I've seen first-time nominations like this one that were nominated seven days late be given an IAR exception, and under the circumstances I think we could certainly do so here: the size of the article prior to the expansion's beginning on February 13 was 878 prose characters and it had a number of templated issues, while the article is now 4903 prose characters and the issues noted by the templates have been addressed. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Okeedokee. Be back later.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like a good entry. The article essay has some matching content, but this appears to be copied from this article rather than the other way around. So no problems there. I can't load Earwig's Copyvio Detector right now, but I'll get back later with a copvio check.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Copyvio checked. The hook is good to go.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 00:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
