Template:Did you know nominations/Relationship between religion and science
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 06:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
article was not expanded (and is too large for a 5x expansion), and nomination was never transcluded; closing as unsuccessful
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Relationship between religion and science
- ... that the relationship between religion and science has not always been one of contention? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
5x expanded by Redheadscholar (talk). Self-nominated at 04:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC).
Sorry, Redheadscholar, but it's not eligible. Relationship between religion and science is currently almost 80,000 prose characters, so the required five times expansion is not possible. You haven't edited the article, but I see you have edited User:UCSC: Relationship Between Religion and Science. That is also not eligible because, first, it's not in article space, and second, I assume it covers the same subject matter as the existing article, so it can't merely be moved to article space; it would have to be merged. (Also, the nomination hasn't been transcluded.) Please see WP:DYK for more information. If you get the article to Good article status, you may resubmit within a week of that designation. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 06:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
