Template:Did you know nominations/Retrieval-induced forgetting
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 11:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Retrieval-induced forgetting
edit- ... that even remembering can cause forgetting?
- ALT1:... that remembering a secondary definition of a homograph can cause forgetting of its dominant meaning?
- ALT2:... that remembering some metals can cause forgetting of other metals?
- Reviewed: Annie Wyatt
- Comment: Article created in my userspace in December 2011 moved to mainspace on August 20th 2012.
Created by I Jethrobot (talk). Self nom at 22:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Numerous unreferenced sections. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- References have been added for each of the sections. Sections that contain examples to illustrate the methdology were drawn from one study (the initial study that demonstrated the phenomenon), which is why it is cited repeatedly. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Still some references missing, including sentences like "Such models may explain...", which read like original research. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
AGF on offline sources. New enough and long enough, refs look reliable. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- Unreferenced sections have been addressed with either new or existing references as needed. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
