- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Robert Brode
edit- ... that Robert Brode led the group that developed the fuses used in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self nominated at 11:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC).
Looks good to me. Article's in good shape, hook fact is present and cited. Only quibble is that there's a bit of inconsistency between the use of "fuse" and "fuze" in the article. GRAPPLE X 04:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- I can't remember what the correct form is in US English, but the Manhattan Project consistently used "fuse" so I'm going with that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- see fuze. apparently, there's special meaning with the z-word. -- Ohc ¡digame! 12:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Before this is promoted, can the "fuse" vs. "fuze" issue please be reexamined in light of the above? If the source uses "fuze", then the text almost certainly ought to as well, since this isn't a matter of spelling consistency. I'd say it depends on the cited sources for each use of the word. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- I can't remember what the correct form is in US English, but the Manhattan Project consistently used "fuse" so I'm going with that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
