- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Rosalie Edge
Rosalie Edge
Improved to Good Article status by Firefangledfeathers (talk). Self-nominated at 20:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC).
- Starting review. Updates to follow. Ktin (talk) 02:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Meets eligibility criteria - length, and newness i.e. recently promoted to GA. Article is well sourced. I will WP:AGF on some of the offline sources. QPQ done. Hook is cited and is interesting. Earwig does not find any issues. Marking this hook approved. I would encourage the nominator to consider adding the picture (which seems to be in WP:PD to the nomination as well. As a member of WP:WiR I think this is something we should push for. With or without the picture, this one is good to go. Ktin (talk) 02:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ktin, thanks a lot! I think I included the image in the nom, but I'm not sure I did it right. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reviewing the picture. The picture looks good and is in WP:PD. Albeit aged (for obvious reasons) this one meets homepage quality expectations. Btw, if there is a way to clip the text from the bottom of the image, I would recommend we do that. With or without that, this one is good to go with the image. Original 'Tick' should suffice as proof of approval. Nice work. Ktin (talk) 02:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I swapped in a cropped version of the image, here and in the article. Good advice. Firefangledfeathers (talk /
contribs) 03:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Looks good. To the promoter, I (am speaking on behalf of the nominator, but) would prefer that we go with this one into the image slot, even if it means waiting longer for a slot to come available. Ktin (talk) 04:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Same! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Meets eligibility criteria - length, and newness i.e. recently promoted to GA. Article is well sourced. I will WP:AGF on some of the offline sources. QPQ done. Hook is cited and is interesting. Earwig does not find any issues. Marking this hook approved. I would encourage the nominator to consider adding the picture (which seems to be in WP:PD to the nomination as well. As a member of WP:WiR I think this is something we should push for. With or without the picture, this one is good to go. Ktin (talk) 02:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)