Template:Did you know nominations/Rufescent tiger heron
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 11:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rufescent tiger heron
edit
- ... that it takes five years for young rufescent tiger herons to acquire adult plumage?
- ALT1:... that the rufescent tiger heron is crepuscular—that is, it hunts primarily at dusk and dawn?
- ALT2:... that, unlike most herons, the rufescent tiger heron has no powder down feathers on its back?
5x expanded by MeegsC (talk). Self nominated at 02:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC).
MeegsC, it has been over three weeks without a QPQ being supplied. We can wait another week or so, but I can't see this remaining open past a month without you having started one by then. I hope to see a response from you before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset:: I should know better than to queue one of these right before leaving on tour! :P Will sort something out this week... MeegsC (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. We'll call for a reviewer as soon as it's set. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: I've reviewed Noah Galloway. MeegsC (talk) 15:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Good to go with original hook or ALT1. New enough when nominated, long enough, neutral, sourced, not plagiarized (ran Dup Detector or did cursory check on several sources, and am taking the rest on good faith),- hook < 200, hook accurate & cited (except I'm not sure about ALT2; you say "unlike most herons" in ALT2, and the text says "unlike most tiger herons"; also, while the cited source doesn't say the bird has "powder down feathers" it doesn't explicitly mention their absence, either), hook interesting, hook not about a human, qpq done, image free (CC, not fair use), used in article, & looks good. --Rosekelleher (talk) 22:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
