Template:Did you know nominations/Salvatore J. Salamone
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
COI and promotional concerns. The article is currently at AFD.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Salvatore J. Salamone
edit
Dr. Salvatore J. Salamone, c. 2018
- ... that Salvatore J. Salamone (pictured) was inducted into the New Jersey Inventors Hall of Fame, joining the ranks of Albert Einstein and Thomas Edison?
- ALT1:... that Salvatore J. Salamone's efforts resulted in the launch of seven major reagent product lines?
Created by JBuckley93 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC).
- Comment In an edit history that dates back to April 2018, JBuckley93 has a grand total of seven edits, of which three relate to creating the nominated article for Salamone, two relate to his company and two relate to this DYK nomination. The only mainspace link to the nominated article is from Saladax Biomedical (his company) and the only link to the company article is from his article. The article might just barely pass the DYK standards, but the WP:COI (among other) issues appear rather blatant and this has every appearance of an attempt to get this article promoted on Wikipedia's front page from an editor who can't possibly have figured out how to accomplish all of this in an edit history comprised of a handful of edits. Alansohn (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. There is a big {{ad}} tag that needs to be dealt with and the tone of the article sounds indeed promotional. I also don't see how WP:GNG is met here, considering that all sources mention Mr. Salamone only in passing. The first source does mostly not support the content given. Source #2 is a list of publications, again it does not support the content given. Last paragraph is unsourced. The first hook is interesting but needs more precise sourcing. No QPQ needed but this article needs serious work before it can go on the Main Page, assuming that we should have the article at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
