JBuckley93

Welcome!

Hello, Johnsaladax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Salvatore J. Salamone

Hello! Your submission of Salvatore J. Salamone at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Salvatore J. Salamone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salvatore J. Salamone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvatore J. Salamone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alansohn (talk) 03:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

COI

Can you tell me what your connection is to Salvatore J. Salamone? It would be very helpful. Thanks. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:JBuckley93/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:JBuckley93/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Salvatore J. Salamone has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Salvatore J. Salamone. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JBuckley93/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:JBuckley93/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, JBuckley93! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:JBuckley93/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:JBuckley93/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Salvatore J. Salamone has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Salvatore J. Salamone. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JBuckley93/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:JBuckley93/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Salvatore J. Salamone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Salvatore J. Salamone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saladax Biomedical

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saladax Biomedical, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saladax Biomedical

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saladax Biomedical, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hiwilms (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, JBuckley93. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 18:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Back in September, another editor expressed concern about your relationship with Saladax Biomedical, but you did not respond to this question. There is a legitimate concern that you are single-purpose account writing solely about the company and its personnel, and that you have an undisclosed paid relationship with them. Please be aware that if you are employed by the company, or are a third party paid to represent their interests in any capacity, it is mandatory for you to disclose this information per Wikipedia's non-negotiable paid-contribution disclosure policy. If I am mistaken and you are not being paid to write about them, please state so. In either case, please respond to this inquiry before making any further edits. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Asherah appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Can you please provide evidence of this before you make such an action? I provided a reference to updated evidence, I do not understand how this fits your characterization of my edit. John Buckley (talk) 01:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

You may wish to take the issue at WP:FTN, but I already know the answer. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for the added arrogance. Definitely reassuring that there are no preconceived biases on your end. Send me a reference and I’ll read it. But I have little confidence you looked into the journal article I referenced. John Buckley (talk) 02:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Did you seriously send me two YouTube videos as your retort? Try harder. John Buckley (talk) 02:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks". tgeorgescu (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Who knew, Wikipedia users are now more insufferable than Reddit users. Where’s your follow-up citation of why my point is a “fringe theory”? John Buckley (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

I know the result at WP:FTN, and my two cents are that you know it, too, but you're here just to stir trouble. That is, if you don't know it, then you are severely ignorant, and if you know it, then you're just a troll. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)