Template:Did you know nominations/South Sudan National Cup
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
South Sudan National Cup
edit- ... that the South Sudan National Cup was first held in 2012? Source: NB: the 2012 edition was the first
- ALT1:... that Al-Malakia FC has won the most South Sudan National Cups in history? Source: See list of winners in the "South Sudan Cup" section
- Reviewed: Egypt at the 1906 Intercalated Games
5x expanded by Yellow Dingo (talk). Self-nominated at 10:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 162 chars to 3030 chars since 15:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC), a 18.70-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3030 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (2.9% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 53 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 69 characters
- ✓ Yellow Dingo has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Egypt at the 1906 Intercalated Games was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
The article was expanded more than fivefold less than seven days before the nomination. It is long enough and neutral. There do not seem to be serious copyright issues. The words "South Sudan gained independence from Sudan" are the same as in the source. This probably does not cause a copyright violation, but it would be better to paraphrase it less closely. The nominator has done QPQ. The article uses inline citations. Most of the information is verified in the sources. The source cited for the fact that South Sudan gained independence on 9 July 2011 only states that it gained independence in July 2011. The fact is stated in the South Sudan article, so it is probably correct, but it would be better to include a citation that verifies it directly. The sources do not seem to verify that the South Sudan Football Association was formed in April 2011. This source cited in the article states that it was founded in 2011, but does not state which month. The South Sudan Football Association article seems to contain sources for it. The article needs to be copy edited. It contains confusing sentences such as "The semi-finals were one of matches." The hooks are cited, and they are short. ALT1 seems more interesting. Gulumeemee (talk) 04:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Gulumeemee, I have fixed all your stated issues. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
The article seems good to go now. Gulumeemee (talk) 09:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- I was going to promote this, but the four citations I checked (7, 8, 9, 10) all produced error messages. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- The citations are OK now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- I was going to promote this, but the four citations I checked (7, 8, 9, 10) all produced error messages. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
