Template:Did you know nominations/Sparkle in the Rain

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Sparkle in the Rain's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC).

Sparkle in the Rain

edit

5x expanded by Laydsb (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 00:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

  • An enormous expansion, going from 1,160 characters to 16,333. Article is fully referenced with a direct citation for the hook fact. I'm wondering it the hook itself might be better to say "UK Album charts" rather than LP, but I'll leave that up to the person moving to the prep section to decide. More than meets the DYK criteria, I would say that the only thing standing out at the moment which prevents it from being an easy candidate for a Good Article is that the lead could use some expansion. But for DYK, its good to go. I also appreciate Casliber doing a QPQ review when they didn't have to. Miyagawa (talk) 14:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)