The following is an archived discussion of Stonebergia's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Stonebergia
edit... that the extinct rose species Stonebergia columbiana is only found in British Columbia?
- Reviewed: Boletinellus merulioides
- Comment: Reviewed Boletus miniato-olivaceus, part of the Template:Did you know nominations/Boletinellus merulioides multi-nom hook.
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nominated at 21:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC).
I wasn't able to find that claim in the article. It says that the plant has been found in BC, but not that this is the only location. Also, I think saying that an extinct plant is in a certain place sounds a little weird.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- The type paper is the only verifiable source for locations where Stonebergia has been found. Per the type paper the species and genus is only found at the One Mile Creek site of the Allenby Formsation.--Kevmin § 06:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- I feel a little uneasy with passing a hook that is not based on a source but on the mere absence of sources. Is there another interesting fact in the article that we could use?--Carabinieri (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- hmmm how about:
alt1 "... that the extinct rose species Stonebergia columbiana is named for its type locality of British Columbia?" --Kevmin § 22:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. The hook is sourced to a paper, the full text of which is not available to me. Going with alt1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
