Template:Did you know nominations/Stress (Justice song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 04:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Stress (Justice song)

edit
  • ... that the music video for Justice's song "Stress" has been regarded as one of the most controversial of all time?
  • ALT1: ... that the music video for Justice's song "Stress", which includes scenes of teens committing gang violence across Paris, has been regarded as one of the most controversial music videos of all time?

Created by Aria1561 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC).

  • I hate hooks that say "has been regarded". ("Accolades" and "acclaimed" are tied for second.) EEng 23:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
  • @EEng: would "noted" or "recognized" sound any better? Aria1561 (talk) 03:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Unless the source is very authoritative, these kinds of most/best/greatest evaluations aren't hookworthy (and even if, should be attributed). NME might be such an authoritative source, but I don't know. Isn't there anything else worth saying. Just so you know, I just dropped in at DYK for old times' sake -- I really don't want to get into these conversations, though I'm sure other editors will help on this. Good luck. EEng 05:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT2: ... that the music video for Justice's song "Stress", ranked by Complex magazine as the second-best music video of the 2000s, was banned from French television? --PFHLai (talk) 08:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This could work too, although I still think one of hooks I made would seem more interesting. Aria1561 (talk) 03:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. Approving ALT2 as I agree with EEng on this. The hook facts are sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright problems. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)