Template:Did you know nominations/Swill milk scandal
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Swill milk scandal
edit... that The New York Times estimated that 8,000 infants died in one year because of the swill milk nuisance?
Created by Altenmann (talk). Nominated by Tentinator (talk) at 13:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC).
- A bit of grammar, if I may suggest: Actually deaths were due to swill milk or swill milk nuisance, not due to scandal . - Altenmann >t 11:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. I do suggest a new hook, since "nuisance" reads badly in that context. How about:
- ALT1: ... that The New York Times estimated that 8,000 infants died in one year from consuming swill milk that was sold as fresh milk?
- Of course, the relevant sentences in the article would need to be inline sourced; in addition, the first two paragraphs under History will need at least one inline source per DYK rules. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- The first two paragraphs of the History section each have two references now. Tentinator 08:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
This article is long enough and new enough. It is sufficiently well referenced and the ALT1 hook fact has suitable inline citations. I saw no evidence of close paraphrasing. No QPQ required. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
