- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 talk 11:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Talli Osborne
Created by
Bridget (
talk).
Number of QPQs required:
1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.
Bridget (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is new and long enough, as it was moved to mainspace on 15 September. Earwig returns false positive based on large blockquote. Hook is supported by the Isador 2015 source in Vice. Hook length and interest is good, at 134 characters, however, if you are interested, you can go even shorter. Playing around with it, I was able to bring it down to 129 chars, but that's a personal preference. @Bridget: The only outstanding issue I can see here is the status of the claimed QPQ which was a procedural rejection of a duplicate hook that was already reviewed by another user. I'm not convinced this counts as a full review based on the QPQ requirements, but I'm open to discussion. It might help to submit another QPQ. Otherwise, with the QPQ status pending based on your response and the input of the community, we are almost good to go. Update: Another user has shared their input and says the QPQ qualifies, so I am passing it now. Good work. Viriditas (talk) 22:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Viriditas: thanks for taking the time to review this and get the clarification on the QPQ's eligibility! You shouldn't have had to do that – it would have be easier if I had just went ahead and did another review. I was putting in the effort that I would put in for a routine review before finding out it was a duplicate, which is why I ended up using it as a QPQ, but that's obviously not apparent in the review itself. Best, Bridget (talk) 01:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Article is new and long enough, as it was moved to mainspace on 15 September. Earwig returns false positive based on large blockquote. Hook is supported by the Isador 2015 source in Vice. Hook length and interest is good, at 134 characters, however, if you are interested, you can go even shorter. Playing around with it, I was able to bring it down to 129 chars, but that's a personal preference. @Bridget: The only outstanding issue I can see here is the status of the claimed QPQ which was a procedural rejection of a duplicate hook that was already reviewed by another user. I'm not convinced this counts as a full review based on the QPQ requirements, but I'm open to discussion. It might help to submit another QPQ. Otherwise, with the QPQ status pending based on your response and the input of the community, we are almost good to go. Update: Another user has shared their input and says the QPQ qualifies, so I am passing it now. Good work. Viriditas (talk) 22:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)