The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Length and grammar

Teambox

edit

Created/expanded by Mabdul (talk), Ilpopu (talk). Nominated by Mabdul (talk) at 15:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Everything looks fine to me, although the article is very close to the 1,500 character minimum. Toa Nidhiki05 17:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
  • The article currently has below 1,000 characters (bulleted lists do not count), and a prominent copyedit tag. Many sentences, including the hook, are not grammatical. I am also not entirely sure about the notability of this software. --Pgallert (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC)