Template:Did you know nominations/The Party (Andy Shauf album)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Party (Andy Shauf album)
- ... that each song on Andy Shauf's 2016 album The Party is sung from the perspective of a different guest at a house party? Source: https://www.npr.org/2016/05/12/477030942/first-listen-andy-shauf-the-party
ALT1: ... that Andy Shauf's 2016 album The Party tells the story of a single night at a house party? Source: https://www.npr.org/2016/05/12/477030942/first-listen-andy-shauf-the-partyALT2: ... that Andy Shauf's 2016 album The Party was shortlisted for the 2016 Polaris Music Prize? Source: https://polarismusicprize.ca/blog/2016-polaris-music-short-list-is-here/- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Pogorelc
Converted from a redirect by Noahfgodard (talk). Self-nominated at 08:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC).
OK--new enough, long enough, no plagiarism that I saw, sources seem to be represented fairly. The only problem I have is with the last sentence: "he Party is considered by many to have been the first album to win Shauf widespread recognition". "Considered by many" is already pretty weak, and the second reference, the Grammy link, goes nowhere, nor do I find any hit on the Grammy website for him. Perhaps I'm wrong, but that needs to be checked, and the phrasing adjusted a. for non-weaselishness and b. depending on whether there is a Grammy article. Drmies (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Thank you for the review, and for bringing these issues to my attention! I fixed the Grammy website link (not sure what happened before) and made the wording more objective/neutral. Does that look better to you? Noahfgodard (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
