Template:Did you know nominations/The Troelfth Cake
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
The Troelfth Cake
edit... that the French satirical drawing of the First Partition of Poland, The Troelfth Cake, caused much controversy in late-18th-century Europe?
- Reviewed: Bob Beckwith
- Comment:
Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 21:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Length, history, sourcing all good. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know if the above was supposed to be a review. My version: date, length referencing fine, detailed Polish sources AGF, no apparent copyvio/pl. I am not happy with the hook which is very general and doesn't appear like that in the article. Suggestions to think about:
- ALT1: ... that the 1773 French satirical drawing of the First Partition of Poland, The Troelfth Cake (pictured), was banned in several European countries?
- ALT2:
... that the 1773 French satirical drawing of the First Partition of Poland, The Troelfth Cake (pictured), likely was intended to be The Twelfth Cake in English?--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)- I like ALT1, specific but in keeping with the original. sonia♫ 14:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am ok with ALT1. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am ok with ALT1. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I like ALT1, specific but in keeping with the original. sonia♫ 14:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know if the above was supposed to be a review. My version: date, length referencing fine, detailed Polish sources AGF, no apparent copyvio/pl. I am not happy with the hook which is very general and doesn't appear like that in the article. Suggestions to think about: