- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tiffany Trump
edit- ... that Tiffany Trump has been called part of the "Snap Pack" for her voluminous postings to Instagram?
Created by LavaBaron (talk). Self-nominated at 02:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Maybe I'm blind, but I can't see where it says she's part of the group; could you please point me to a specific quote? --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Jakob it's interpretative in the NYT article. I've added a new source from New York Magazine that is unambiguous, though. LavaBaron (talk) 14:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I added New York Magazine to the prose. Source checks out online. May I please ask why Ms. Trump is an Internet celebrity, but the Obama children are not? They seem to be covered well in the article Family of Barack Obama. Maybe you can add something notable that Ms. Trump has accomplished. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
I think it should be okay now. Accomplishments are irrelevant to notability; only significant coverage matters, and there is plenty of that. I highly recommend that someone write a couple of WP articles about the Obama children, though I fear the deletionists would try to shoot them down. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Jakob it's interpretative in the NYT article. I've added a new source from New York Magazine that is unambiguous, though. LavaBaron (talk) 14:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I have pulled this from prep 3 because it was previously a redirect due to notability concerns, and I have not seen a discussion resolving that issue. Gatoclass (talk) 21:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Now at AfD again.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- As per a decision in ANI, two reviews of this are required. LavaBaron (talk) 15:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: AfD has closed as "keep". BlueMoonset (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Online source checks out, as do dates. No copyvios. Ready to go! -SusanLesch (talk) 23:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Put on hold until the most recent AfD has sorted itself out. If it is kept, we can see what to do with this nomination. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- New AfD already closed as "snow keep". Restoring tick placed by SusanLesch a week ago. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)