- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Theleekycauldron talk 04:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Toro de fuego
Toro de fuego in San Sebastián
- ... that toros de fuego, bulls of fire, are used in festivals instead of real bulls?
- Alt 1a ... that bulls of fire are used in festivals instead of real bulls?
- Alt2 ... that while the people of San Sebastián use flaming bovine puppets during their great week festival, the puppets are not "great bulls of fire"?"
- Source: "Playing with Fire". Running of the Bulls. 2018-03-27. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
5x expanded by Evrik (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 114 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.--evrik (talk) 04:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
- Fixed. --evrik (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: - I think this may be a candidate for Wikipedia:April Fools' Main Page/Did you know. What do you think? --evrik (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
evrik, I do not have full access to El Pais. Can you recheck the second paragraph of Background, the one on San Sebastián, to make sure that text is supported? Either way, I suggest adding more details from El Pais. The detail will help the article and provide good hooks. Sparks flying 1.5m from 30 running metal fire bulls; that's a hook. CMD (talk) 14:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- CMD, I put the text here. The point may be moot as that section just got reorganized when I fixed the links. "Sparks flying 1.5 meters (4 ft 11 in) from 30 running metal fire bulls" - I'm thinking about it. --evrik (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- CMD, where does your review stand? FYI, evrik is a few days into a 30-day block, so I hope there aren't significant problems. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Chipmunkdavis: Any updates on this nomination? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the current oldest fully unreviewed nomination and I want a QPQ (and really don't fancy getting involved with the Party of Revolutionary Communism meganom), so I'm reviewing. Long enough, new enough. "Great bulls of fire" is not in the source and the other two ALTs feel a bit object-does-its-jobby. In addition, "Toro de fuego (Ayerbe) [es] (Huesca) or Fuente de Pedro Naharro (Cuenca). Depending on the location, carts or frames carried by one or more people, with pyrotechnics, are used." needs a source. Given that Evrik's block will take this nomination well past the two month mark (and there's an argument, given that nominations could become problematic at any point and can be closed after a week without action, that any user blocked for more than a week should forfeit their active nominations anyway) I am rejecting this; any other editor is free to adopt this nomination, else Evrik is free to renominate once this is a GA.--Launchballer 12:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
