Template:Did you know nominations/Trent Kelly (politician)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Trent Kelly (politician)
edit- ... that Trent Kelly, recently elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, defeated a nine-term incumbent to become a district attorney in northeastern Mississippi in 2011?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/United Kingdom general election, 2005 (Northern Ireland)
- Comment: The election is June 2. I think we should avoid running this too close to that date, to avoid the appearance of an endorsement. If we run it after the election, of course, we'll need to tweak the tense of the hook.
Created by Coemgenus (talk). Self-nominated at 13:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC).
- Struck ALT0 as we cannot possibly run a hook on an upcoming candidate like this. After the election a new hook in past tense will be needed. EEng (talk) 05:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know of any policy against it, but as the article is currently in the midst of a notability debate, I'll agree that we should wait until after the election to run this DYK. The debate will be resolved then, one way or another. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Of course we have a rule against it, for reasons which surely must be obvious. WP:Did_you_know#Content EEng (talk) 22:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know of any policy against it, but as the article is currently in the midst of a notability debate, I'll agree that we should wait until after the election to run this DYK. The debate will be resolved then, one way or another. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- This article is new enough and long enough and the election is long past. The hook facts are reliably sourced, the article is neutral, and I detected no close paraphrasing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)