The following is an archived discussion of Tubutulik River's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tubutulik River
edit- ... that areas along the Tubutulik River contain abnormal radioactivity?
5x expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 04:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC).
5x expansion and hook sourcing verified. However, I'm not sure whether it's a simple copy and paste error or a sign of a more serious problem, but the "Watershed management" section has both some ungrammatical text and some text that appears to have been copied directly from its source. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
-
Ok. I think the "Geography" section could still use a more thoughtful organization (e.g. it talks about where the river rises both in the first paragraph and then in more vague terms in the third) but I think all the issues that could block DYK are taken care of; I didn't find any more copied text. I made some minor grammatical fixes in the "Wildlife" section, but nothing that would affect the actual content. Good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
