Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/USS Ozark (1863)

< Template:Did you know nominations
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of USS Ozark (1863)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC).

USS Ozark (1863)

edit
(
)

5x expanded by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nominated at 20:22, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

  • Size, age, and expansion all check out. The sourcing is excellent; I will AGF on the hook because of the book cite. --Guerillero | My Talk 20:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Not only is the hook too long at 206 characters, but the article phrase that was used for the hook is from the lede and not cited. The source citation in the article body is after a sentence that does not mention the large number of blacks that were killed, a key hook fact. Although it is best to have all text in the lede echoed in body of the article, DYK usually doesn't insist on it. However, the hook material must be properly cited wherever it is, and "a large number of" is quite vague and (if the Colfax Massacre article is accurate) ought to be made less vague, as I thought maybe 10 to 15 until I saw the article and realized that scholarly estimates are at over five dozen. (Congress was told over 100.) BlueMoonset (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
  • If Sturmvogel 66 is okay with the new hook, it looks fine (and supported) to me. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:25, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/USS_Ozark_(1863)&oldid=1031309599"