Template:Did you know nominations/United States biological defense program

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of United States biological defense program's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:50, 10 March 2013 (UTC).

United States biological defense program

edit
  • Comment: New and long enough, hook fact is properly sourced.

Created/expanded by Valerius Tygart (talk). Nominated by LlamaAl (talk) at 22:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Length, history and reference verified. However, one section is tagged as outdated, and I tagged the references section with {{Ibid}}. You're on your own for the first one, but I suggest that for the second you put your frequently-cited works (like the one that supports the hook) in a "works cite" section so you can just use the short form in all your footnotes. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Two weeks with no action. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment - As I stated on my talk page, I withdraw my nom. I really don't have time to work in the article. --LlamaAl (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)