Template:Did you know nominations/Unus testis, nullus testis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 04:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Unus testis, nullus testis

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the unus testis, nullus testis rule has been criticised because it makes convictions in rape cases very difficult? Source: Coan, Christin B. (2000). "Rethinking the Spoils of War: Prosecuting Rape as a War Crime in the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia". North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation. 26 (1): 213
  • ALT1: ... that the unus testis, nullus testis rule has biblical roots? Source: Adamczewski, Karol (2023). "Exceptions to the Application of the Rule "Testis Unus, Testis Nullus" in the Canonical Process". Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego. 18 (1): 10
  • ALT2: ... that it has been argued that the unus testis, nullus testis rule was abrogated because judicial torture had been abolished earlier? Source: Wacke, Andreas (1997). "Unus Testis, Nullus Testis. Entstehung und Überwindung des Dogmas vom Legalen Beweismass". Fundamina (in German). 3, 54-55
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Needham (librarian) (ongoing)
  • Comment: As I am always unsure I need advise whether a dash should be inserted between "unus testis, nullus testis" and "rule" - thanks!

Created by WatkynBassett (talk) on 28 July 2023. Self-nominated at 18:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Unus testis, nullus testis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• , really interesting article. Thoroughly enjoyed the read. Article is newly created, long enough and within policy. I honestly think ALT0 is by far the best. The other two aren't that interesting or inherently understood. QPQ is done. Everything looks good. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Thank you so much for your review and your kind words, Gonzo_fan2007! WatkynBassett (talk) 18:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)