Template:Did you know nominations/Vibronic spectroscopy
The following is an archived discussion of Vibronic spectroscopy's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 10:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC).
Three months old!
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Vibronic spectroscopy
editCreated by Petergans (talk). Self nominated at 08:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC).
Petergans, this unfortunately does not qualify at all for DYK: it was created on January 31 and is three months old, while DYK nominations are supposed to be nominated within five days of creation, or within five days of an expansion that increases an article to five times its pre-expansion length. If there had been a few days delay we might have been able to consider it, but not a matter of months. I see it's been a while since your last nomination: you might want to review the rules at WP:DYK. Among other things, the article you're nominating needs to be in bold and wikilinked, and the hook text must end with a question mark. Best of luck for next time! BlueMoonset (talk) 10:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
