- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Visual Capture
edit- ... that ventriloquism is believable not just because its performers are good at what they do, but because of visual capture?
- ALT1: ... that what you see can completely change what you perceive in an environment because of visual capture?
5x expanded by Gramos3 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC).
New and long enough (5x expansion). Well (authoritatively) written. Neutral, dispassionate tone. Needs inline citations in a number places. I prefer ALT1. Hybernator (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Gramos3 hasn't edited in over a month; looks like they just produced this article, nominated it for DYK, and went for a looooonnnngggg lunch. Not that I'm against people not editing for a while and then launching back into it, but I suggest this gets closed if there is no response soon. Belle (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
The presence of so many "citation needed" templates renders this ineligible for DYK, and the nominator appears to have been part of a course that used Wikipedia. With the semester long over and no edits on Wikipedia since the nomination, and no response to a talk-page ping made over a week ago, the only thing we can do is close the nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
